“This [webinar on Choosing Between R01, R21, and R03] was excellent, which I am sure you hear all the time. Even though I have done NSF applications for 15 years, this was wonderful knowledge for NIH that I needed (and in my humble opinion all newer grantees need).”
Dr. Jorja Kimball, Executive Director of Division of Research, Texas A&M University

“Excellent. I really appreciated the way the presenter walked us through the process and comparison. The [ESI status] timeline and discussion on 2 [R01 submission] cycles in addition to number of years on K [award] was particularly a very good piece of information…

I took another webinar because I found this so informative and have recommended to several of my staff. Thanks!!”
Anonymous Survey Evaluation for webinar “Choosing Your NIH Funding Mechanism”


Details:

Who:
Grantees who are new to the NIH submission process.
When:
View on demand now
Cost:
$99
CME Learning Objectives:
At the end of this 29 minute session, participants will be able to:

  1. Recognize the differences between the common NIH grant applications
  2. Identify the mechanism that best fits their project at this time
ACCREDITATION AND AMA CREDIT DESIGNATION STATEMENTS
This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of the Massachusetts Medical Society and Meg Bouvier Medical Writing, LLC. The Massachusetts Medical Society is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

The Massachusetts Medical Society designates this internet enduring material for a maximum of 0.50 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.


$99.00

Category: