APPROACH General Suggestions

14 Steps

  • Have I carefully reviewed the detailed SF424 instructions and scoring criteria? Have I studied the FOA to see if there are specific instructions and scoring criteria?
  • Did I study the FOA-specific instructions/scoring criteria?
  • Have I created an outline that includes all necessary sections, as appropriate for the project type? Have I made certain that I did not omit key sections?
  • Have I used all my available space to argue persuasively for my project?
  • Have I opted for visual breaks over white space to maximize space without sacrificing readability?
  • Have I formatted the outline to facilitate skimming?
  • Have I considered creatively using figures and tables (beyond for preliminary data) to maximize space, enhance skimming, and emphasize key points?
  • Have I considered if my formatting strategies are appropriate for a color-blind reviewer?
  • Have I avoided long sections of unformatted text?
  • Have I spent time researching the reviewers on my study section so that I deeply understand my audience? Have I discussed the panel with the PO?
  • Have I looked at the excellent resources and samples on the NIAID website?
  • Have I had an outside reader assess whether it makes sense to them?
  • Have I familiarized myself with the NIH definitions of a human subjects or clinical trial project, and do I understand which project type I am doing? Have I carefully considered whether it is an NIH-defined human subjects project, using NIH infographics and flow charts?
  • If I am doing a human subjects or clinical trial project, have I familiarized myself with the PHS HS & CT Info form, understood how/how much to fill out, and made sure that the detailed info resides in the form and not the Approach section?
Shopping Cart
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop